Salt Lake City tells couple who replaced lawn with wood chips, rocks and plants to add vegetation or face fines

Lucy Parham and her husband Mickey Campbell were unaware of such a requirement. But when they tore up the weed-choked grass in front of their house and replaced it with rocks, mulch and low-water native plants over the past year, they got a letter from the city informing them they were in violation.

The city has encouraged residents to save water by using drought-resistant plants for decades. For some, like Campbell and Parham, xeriscaping was a chance to save water and money and add beauty.

“The flexibility to plant native plants and drought-tolerant plants and bring in attractive flowers not only saves water but also brings in honeybees,” Campbell said. “It just allows for more creativity.”

Photo courtesy of Mickey Campbell | A Salt Lake City couple say they face daily fines after city officials told them their xeriscaped lawn violates ordinances for not having enough vegetation.

To Campbell, the new landscape was a work-in-progress. To an anonymous neighbor, the couple didn’t have enough plants and trees, leading to the complaint to the city.

Enforcement action includes alerting prospective homebuyers of the violations if the property is bought after Campbell and Parham put it up for sale in January, according to emails from civil-enforcement officer Carol Gent that the couple shared with The Tribune. The city would put a “non-compliance” designation on the home, and a prospective buyer would have to sign an agreement with the city to add enough plants.

“I get it, it’s nice to have your patch of grass because it’s nice to lie on and it’s fairly attractive,” said Campbell, noting the couple maintains their backyard grass. “But when it comes to the non-usable space, how much time do people spend in their front yard and park strips?”

The complaint against the home is one of 313 this year, according to city data. Complaints about tall weeds are far more common, with about 1,200 made so far this year.

While Gent told the couple more plants would have to be added, and no fines were assessed because of a grace period, she also informed them that enforcement that ends in mid- to late-October will pick back up in the spring, when fines could be levied. Gent eventually closed the case after The Tribune called with questions.

“I am not in favor of completely empty or gravel-covered front yards,” Mendenhall said. “I think the ordinance was well thought out.”

Several years ago the city scaled back the amount a yard must be covered in lush plant life, from 50 percent to the current 33 percent, according to Gent.

More Stories

Source Article

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*